6 Reasons Why A Publisher Says Yes And 6 Reasons They Say No ~ K.M. Allan

Reblogged from K.M. Allan:

6 Reasons Why A Publisher Says Yes And 6 Reasons They Say No

If you’re wondering what makes the manuscript selected by a publisher so special, you’re not the only one.

I recently attended the KidLitVic conference where that question was put forward to publishers Susannah Chambers (Allen & Unwin), Clair Hume (Affirm Press), and Zoe Walton (Penguin Random House Australia). And a room packed full of writers waited with bated breath to hear the answer.

While the answer given was that the MS needs to personally speak to them, they outlined the reasons they’ll say yes and what makes them say no when considering the manuscripts that come across their desks.

6 Reasons Why A Publisher Says Yes

Amazing Story

Above all else, the story is what matters. Each publisher said that a good story will always be the defining reason they select a manuscript. Stories that are infused by your own experiences, world, and what you know, written in a way that only you can write it, is the key to those amazing stories.

Continue reading at K.M. Allan

Unknown's avatar

About Sue Vincent

Sue Vincent was a Yorkshire born writer, esoteric teacher and a Director of The Silent Eye. She was immersed in the Mysteries all her life. Sue maintained a popular blog and is co-author of The Mystical Hexagram with Dr G.M.Vasey. Sue lived in Buckinghamshire, having been stranded there due to an accident with a blindfold, a pin and a map. She had a lasting love-affair with the landscape of Albion, the hidden country of the heart. Sue  passed into spirit at the end of March 2021.
This entry was posted in reblog and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to 6 Reasons Why A Publisher Says Yes And 6 Reasons They Say No ~ K.M. Allan

  1. Very nice article, but it’s not really true. It’s corporate speak for what publishers want us to believe and having come through the publishing industry at a time when people read manuscripts — not software — and editors in publishing housing (Maxwell Perkins, for example) were there for the entire purpose of helping authors make their manuscripts better — this kind of corporate nonsense infuriates me. Most of my comment is on the author’s site.

    It was not always the author’s responsibility to completely finish every manuscript to the last comma AND do his or her own publicity and advertising and pay for his or her own editor and proofreader. THAT was what your publishing contract was supposed to provide!

    Liked by 1 person

    • For fiction books, having a draft that you THINK is finished, down the the last comma, is expected if you’re at the querying stage.

      You can probably expect a few more rounds of revisions, but it should be polished — even if it’s not perfect.

      And these days? Everyone, traditionally published or not, is expected to do a decent amount of publicity/marketing leg-work. The market is crowded.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Jennie's avatar Jennie says:

    Excellent post!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Jennie Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.